User talk:Michael A. Kovacs, Jr.
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Michael A. Kovacs, Jr., and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cathy (TV Special), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AussieLegend (✉) 09:43, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Cathy (TV Special)
[edit]The article Cathy (TV Special) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 09:43, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Clifford the Big Red Dog (1988 series)
[edit]The article Clifford the Big Red Dog (1988 series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 09:49, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
September 2016
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Clifford the Big Red Dog (1988 series). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 14:33, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Unsourced at The Brave Little Toaster
[edit]Hi there, can you please provide a reference for these changes you made at The Brave Little Toaster? While we don't use IMDb as a reference, I can't find the info there, so I'm curious about it. The article is heavily vandalized, so this information is prone to be disrupted, and having references will help other editors manage the vandalism better.
Also, edits should be flagged as minor only when they are cosmetic changes, that couldn't possibly be the subject of dispute. Typo fixes, adding wikilinks, fixing punctuation, capitalizing letters--these are minor changes. Adding content isn't minor. It'd be appreciated if you'd please keep that in mind going forward. Thanks and regards! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:17, 2 September 2016 (UTC)